Menu
New for 2024, Golden Stars will be the first staff awards ceremony we hold as a Group.
It brings together the former Hull University Teaching Hospitals Trust awards Golden Hearts, and the Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust Our Stars event.
Do you know someone who’s done something amazing?
Maybe they’ve turned around a struggling service, made advances in clinical care which benefit patients and colleagues, or perhaps they’ve spent their life looking after others and it’s now time to say thanks in return?
Whether they work in one of our five hospitals or our community services – we want to hear from you. There’s an award category for everyone – teams, individuals, clinical and non-clinical colleagues.
We know there are so many of our staff who go over and above in the course of their daily work, so what better way to recognise someone than with a Golden Stars Award nomination?
We have 15 awards up for grabs, including one which is put forward by patients and their families.
When making your nomination, it’s important to include as much detail as possible to enable the judges to fully understand what’s great about the person or team you are putting forward.
Think about what exactly they did to solve a problem, the impact their enthusiasm or their commitment have on people around them, and give examples of when they have shown compassion, dedication or leadership.
Please ensure you read the FAQs and Guidelines as well as the Categories and Criteria section first.
Make your nomination shine. Entries should be a minimum of 250 words and a maximum of 1500 words, but remember: it’s about quality, not quantity!
Entries must be received by midnight on Tuesday 30 April 2024 to be entered into this year’s awards. A shortlist will then be made available in the Summer, and our black tie Golden Stars Awards ceremony will be held later this year.
So if you know someone who fits the bill, don’t wait until the last minute…
Submit a nomination today
Nominations for the Golden Stars Awards open on Tuesday 2 April 2024 and close on Tuesday 30 April 2024.
Before you submit your nomination please read the criteria for each award carefully as aligning your nomination to this will mean it’s scored more highly.
Nominations will also score marks for connecting their submissions to one or more of the 6Cs: Care, Compassion, Competence, Courage, Communication, Commitment and explaining how the nominee has embodied the Group values or helped to deliver the group objectives.
This award will go to an individual or team which can demonstrate an outstanding and innovative contribution to research and development.
Nominations may score more highly if they can show how this person or team has:
This award recognises individuals or teams who have taken strides to constantly improve and enhance the services they provide. This could be through a formal quality improvement project, or not – using quality improvement methodology.
Nominations will score more highly if your application includes details of the following:
This award gives patients and their families the opportunity to tell us about their NHS heroes, the people who made a real difference at their time of need, improved their experience and created a lasting positive impact.
Nominations will score more highly if you can show how this person or team has:
This award will go to a team or individual who has successfully implemented an effective patient safety initiative. This may have been the result of learning lessons when something went wrong, addressing feedback from a complaint, PALs query or from a clinical audit, or effectively managing the roll-out of a national initiative.
Your nomination will score more highly if you can show how this person or team has:
This award is for a team, or individual, that has successfully demonstrated a commitment to sustainability and specifically a reduction in the environmental impact of their service or the wider organisation.
You may score more highly if you can show how this person or team has:
Recognising a person or team which promotes equality, diversity and inclusion for service users, staff or the community.
You may score more highly if you can show how this person or team has:
In recognition of an inspiring leader who motivates and encourages their team to achieve great things.
The winner will be a compassionate and visionary role model for staff. They do not need to be a senior manager, as we find leadership at all levels.
You will score more highly if you can evidence how this person has:
This award looks to celebrate those taking their first steps in their NHS career — whether that’s a younger member of the team, an apprentice, or someone who’s new to the NHS. They will have demonstrated a commitment and professionalism in their service and acted as a role model for the Group.
Your nomination will score more highly if you can show how this person has:
Working tirelessly behind the scenes, they rarely receive recognition or acclaim for the vital work they do day in, day out to keep our services running smoothly. This person largely goes unnoticed, but now is their time to shine. They may work in an area of the Group which is less high profile but their contribution is essential.
Your nomination will score more highly if you can show how this person has:
The winning clinical team will have great team spirit and sense of collective purpose. They will communicate and engage well with their colleagues and other parts of the Group and will have excelled themselves in the last 12 months with an inspirational effort.
You may score more highly if your application includes details of the following:
The winning support team will have a great team spirit and sense of collective purpose. They will communicate and engage well with their colleagues and other parts of the Group and will have excelled themselves in the last 12 months with an inspirational effort.
You may score more highly if your application includes details of the following:
We rely on our volunteers for many things; from that friendly face when visitors arrive on site to managing the patient library, helping out on the wards and in the chapel. This is our small way of recognising and sincerely thanking them for their outstanding contribution.
You may score more highly if you can show how this person has:
This award will go to the individual or team which can best demonstrate an improvement or extraordinary success through working with services and departments across the group, and other key partners.
Your nomination will score more highly if you can show how this person or team has:
The winning individual will have dedicated at least 25 years of their career to the NHS. They will truly reflect the 6Cs: Care, Compassion, Competence, Courage, Communication, Commitment; and embody the values of the organisation.
You will score more highly if you can show how this person has:
Our Chief Executive will choose a winner from our Shining Lights awards scheme.
Shining Lights gives staff the chance to tell us about the things that have made them proud to work for the NHS and our Group. Every day the NHS works miracles but a lot of the time these go unheard. However big or small we are encouraging staff to post their Shining Lights on the message board we have set up especially for this purpose.
Each month the Chief Executive chooses a winner and then an overall winner from the previous 12 months is selected for the Golden Stars Awards.
Here are some helpful hints on how to write an effective Golden Stars Awards nomination.
Your nomination should ideally be between 250 and 1,000 words and must not exceed 1,500 words. It should be long enough to detail exactly what the individual/team has done that deserves recognition. A nomination that is only a few lines or one paragraph will not contain enough information for it to be shortlisted. Nominations should give as much detail as possible and cover the points listed as required for that category.
For each category there is a list of what you should try to include. You should cover as many of these points as possible, and link any work done and achievements to the 6Cs. You should include as much detail as you can so that the judges understand exactly what happened, why, the benefits it had for the individual, team, patients, service, trust or Group, what the outcome was, and why it should be recognised by the Trust. Be as descriptive as possible, so rather than just saying “Lisa is brilliant at her job”, explain exactly why and what it is they do that is brilliant, and how that goes above and beyond what is expected. Include as much detail as possible.
If you have evidence such as data or patient feedback, please include that too to strengthen the nomination.
Your nomination should reference as many of the 6Cs as relevant and show that the 6Cs were an integral part of the work done, and were demonstrated by the staff involved. This applies to all nominations — whether the staff involved are clinical or non-clinical. All staff and work being nominated will be linked to at least one of the 6Cs, so tell us how. The work and the way in which it was delivered will also be linked to the Group values, so explain the impact that demonstrating those behaviours and values had on the work and the final outcomes.
See the Categories and Criteria section for more detail.
The closing date for nominations is Tuesday 30 April 2024.
The Golden Stars Awards Team will strive every year to make the judging process as simple and fair as possible. This will help to ensure that the finalists and winners represent the talent and successes we have in our teams and individuals throughout the year at our hospitals.
After the closing date all nominations are scored by the pre-judging team using specific criteria, and a shortlist of five nominations is created for each category. The nominations shortlisted will then go through to the judging panel where the final decisions are made as to who the winners of each category are.
The judging panel is made up of the Group Executive Team, representatives from each Care Group and Directorate, previous awards winners and patient representatives.
The pre-judging team will usually comprise staff from all or some of the following areas:
The pre-judging process takes place from the closing date for applications.
The pre-judging panel are given a maximum of 2 weeks to complete shortlisting and to submit their scores for all applications. All pre-judging is co-ordinated by the Communications and OD teams. If any other individuals are identified for pre-judging, they must be paired with a member of the Communications or OD team to ensure consistency and accuracy of judging. Working in pairs the pre-judges are each allocated 2-3 categories to judge.
Both staff members marking that category must complete the score sheet for each application separately, individually assigning a score for each element. The score sheets for the pre-judging process should be used for all categories.
All scores should then be recorded in a master score sheet, and the top 5 in each category identified.
If there is a tie in scores, or a discrepancy with scores, and it is not possible to identify a top 5, another pair should then re-mark the whole category and add all of the scores together. If it is still not possible to identify a top 5, the whole pre-judging panel should then review the category and select a top 5.
The following individuals are all invited to judge the shortlisted entries:
Once pre-judging is complete, the top 5 applications for all categories are then submitted to the judging panel.
The judging panel are emailed a pack of the top nominations for each category approximately 2 weeks before the panel takes place. They are asked to choose their top 3 in each category, assigning 10 points for 1st place, 5 points for 2nd place and 1 point for 3rd place.
At the judging panel they are then asked to tell the rest of the panel how they have scored each category, and the scores are recorded in an overall score sheet by the Communications and OD team representatives.
If a judge has scored but is unable to attend the formal panel, they may submit their scores electronically to be recorded before the judging panel takes place.
In the event of a tie for any category, the panel will discuss until they can agree a final top 3 in order.
The Chief Executive of the Trust will remain impartial but act as Chair of the judging panel. In the event of a tie where the panel are unable to agree a final top 3, the Chief Executive will score the applications fairly and their vote will provide the deciding vote on which team or individual will win. They must vote and their scores recorded to adjust the overall scores accordingly.
The decision of the judging panel is final.
Applications to the Golden Heart Awards are subject to the following terms and conditions. Please read these carefully before proceeding to the nomination form.